No greater opportunity, responsibility, or obligation can fall to the lot of a human being than to become a physician. In the care of the suffering, [the physician] needs technical skill, scientific knowledge, and human understanding. . . . Tact, sympathy, and understanding are expected of the physician, for the patient is no mere collection of symptoms, signs, disordered functions, damaged organs, and disturbed emotions. [The patient] is human, fearful, and hopeful, seeking relief, help, and reassurance.
–Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 1950
The practice of medicine has changed in significant ways since the first edition of this book appeared in 1950. The advent of molecular biology with its enormous implications for the biological sciences (the sequencing of the human genome), sophisticated new imaging techniques, and advances in bioinformatics and information technology have contributed to an explosion of scientific information that has fundamentally changed the way we define, diagnose, treat, and prevent disease. This explosion of scientific knowledge is not at all static as it continues to intensify with time.
The widespread use of electronic medical records and the Internet have altered the way we practice medicine and exchange information. As today's physician struggles to integrate the copious amounts of scientific knowledge into everyday practice, it is important to remember that the ultimate goal of medicine is to treat the patient. Despite more than 50 years of scientific advances since the first edition of this text, it is critical to underscore that cultivating the intimate relationship that exists between physician and patient still lies at the heart of successful patient care.
The Science and ART of Medicine
Science-based technology and deductive reasoning form the foundation for the solution to many clinical problems. Spectacular advances in biochemistry, cell biology, and genomics, coupled with newly developed imaging techniques, allow access to the innermost parts of the cell and provide a window to the most remote recesses of the body. Revelations about the nature of genes and single cells have opened the portal for formulating a new molecular basis for the physiology of systems. Increasingly, we are understanding how subtle changes in many different genes can affect the function of cells and organisms. We are beginning to decipher the complex mechanisms by which genes are regulated. We have developed a new appreciation of the role of stem cells in normal tissue function and in the development of cancer, degenerative disease, and other disorders. The knowledge gleaned from the science of medicine has already improved and undoubtedly will further improve our understanding of complex disease processes and provide new approaches to disease treatment and prevention. Yet skill in the most sophisticated application of laboratory technology and in the use of the latest therapeutic modality alone does not make a good physician.
When a patient poses challenging clinical problems, an effective physician must be able to identify the crucial elements in a complex history and physical examination, to order the appropriate laboratory tests, and to extract the key results from the crowded computer printouts of data to determine whether to "treat" or to "watch." Deciding whether a clinical clue is worth pursuing or should be dismissed as a "red herring" and weighing whether a proposed treatment entails a greater risk than the disease itself are essential judgments that the skilled clinician must make many times each day. This combination of medical knowledge, intuition, experience, and judgment defines the art of medicine, which is as necessary to the practice of medicine as is a sound scientific base.
Clinical Skills
History-Taking
The written history of an illness should include all the facts of medical significance in the life of the patient. Recent events should be given the most attention. The patient should, at some early point, have the opportunity to tell his or her own story of the illness without frequent interruption and, when appropriate, receive expressions of interest, encouragement, and empathy from the physician. Any event related by the patient, however trivial or seemingly irrelevant, may provide the key to solving the medical problem. In general, only patients who feel comfortable will offer complete information, and thus putting the patient at ease to the greatest extent possible contributes substantially to obtaining an adequate history.
An informative history is more than an orderly listing of symptoms; by listening to patients and noting the way in which they describe their symptoms, physicians can gain valuable insight into the problem. Inflections of voice, facial expression, gestures, and attitude, i.e., "body language," may reveal important clues to the meaning of the symptoms to the patient. Because patients vary in their medical sophistication and ability to recall facts, the reported medical history should be corroborated whenever possible. The social history can also provide important insights into the types of diseases that should be considered. The family history not only identifies rare Mendelian disorders within a family but often reveals risk factors for common disorders such as coronary heart disease, hypertension, or asthma. A thorough family history may require input from multiple relatives to ensure completeness and accuracy. However, once recorded, it can be readily updated. The process of history-taking provides an opportunity to observe the patient's behavior and to watch for features to be pursued more thoroughly during the physical examination.
The very act of eliciting the history provides the physician with the opportunity to establish or enhance the unique bond that forms the basis for the ideal patient-physician relationship. This process helps the physician develop an appreciation of the patient's perception of the illness, the patient's expectations of the physician and the health care system, and the financial and social implications of the illness to the patient. Although current health care settings may impose time constraints on patient visits, it is important not to rush the history-taking since the patient may get the impression that what he or she is relating is not of importance to the physician and therefore may hold back relevant information. The confidentiality of the patient-physician relationship cannot be overemphasized.
(. Bùn ngủ không chịu đc. Sáng đã lọ mọ mò dậy từ 6h kém 15 để đến tr, thế mà ăn ăn uống uống rồi muộn quách nó mất. Chạy thục mạng lên tầng 6, quên xừ nó chưa rút chìa khóa xe. Lần thứ 3 rầu. Miềng thật là hậu đậu quá đi mất. Con bé mắt nhắm mắt mở lên ngồi chưa ấm chỗ thì cô gọi lên bảng. Tự tin như ai, ta đây học bài rồi đới :>. Ối giời ơi, nhưng cái con bé si đần này học nhầm bài cũ ạ =((. Mark 5 for you =((. Nghe câu ấy mà lòng em tan nát, cô ơi 
. Thế là xong, bắt đầu ngày mới bằng con 5 listening, chết với cái môn khỉ gió này, sao mềnh học mãi mà không khá đc nhể :-?
/. Đang chat mí rùa thì đơ, đúng là của chùa :-<
)
....
)
. 2 tháng nữa, nhanh nghỉ hè để đi du lịch nào \
